We first spotted this story a few months ago. Since then we've been working on bringing them on our radio show. In the meantime they've continued to run on clean energy.
The article rightly points out that they have some unique advantages--small size, little demand for power. But we break it down by community and state. When you do that we all have the same advantages. We can cut use. Then produce much of our own. When we do we push energy production local. Which keeps jobs and money close by.
What is stopping us from mimicing their success. Will. And lack of definitive plan. Not that hard to summon up both.
Costa Rica hasn't burned any fossil fuels for electricity in two months
Maria GallucciCosta Rica's electric grid ran exclusively on renewable energy for 150 days so far this year, the country's power operator said late last week.
Half of those days were achieved in only the last few months.
The Central American nation was powered for 76 straight days on carbon-free electricity from June 16 to Sept. 2, according to the Costa Rica Electricity Institute (ICE).
It's easy to point to Costa Rica's clean energy success as a model for fossil fuel-dependent nations to follow.
However, it's not an example that the big polluters of the world can easily emulate anytime soon.
Second, there's the matter of the country's rather paltry electricity appetite. This nation of 4.9 million people generated about 10,713 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2015, according to a July report from the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
The United States, by contrast, generated about 373 times more electricity, with roughly 4 million gigawatt-hours of total generation in 2015, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
And third, Costa Rica is rich in hydroelectric resources. The majority of the nation's clean power comes from its four main hydropower facilities, which are fed by multiple rivers and abundant seasonal rainfall.
Hydropower alone accounted for about 80 percent of Costa Rica's total electricity generation in August, according to National Energy Control Center data cited by ICE.
While dams provide a cleaner source of electricity, they can have large environmental and social consequences, from displacing indigenous communities, disrupting wildlife habitats and turning healthy rivers into stagnant, algae-filled pools.
Geothermal plants provided about 12.6 percent of electricity generation in August. Wind turbines supplied 7.1 percent, while solar power accounted for just 0.01 percent.
Costa Rica's stretch of fossil fuel-free days this year follows its even cleaner results from 2015. Last year, Costa Rica logged 299 total days without burning oil, coal or natural gas for a single megawatt of electricity.
Hydropower, wind, solar, geothermal and biomass accounted for over 98 percent of its total electricity output in 2015, according to the regional economic commission report. Natural gas-fired cogeneration and thermal power plants supplied the remaining 1.8 percent.
Revantazón is the largest public infrastructure project in Central America after the Panama Canal. The dam's five turbines will have a generating capacity of 305.5 megawatts, enough to power around 525,000 homes.
The project will bring "stable and renewable energy for the benefit of all sectors in the country," Obregón said in the ICE press release.
No comments:
Post a Comment