Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Crystalline Material Could Replace Silicon to double efficiency of solar cells/ Today's show

We hope you in today at 1p as interviewed Purdue University Assistant Professor of Physical Chemistry, and lead team member on this project, Libai Huang.  In a great one-hour conversation, we explored the world of solar today and her vision of it tomorrow.

More importantly, we looked at its impact on our world as consumers and users of renewables.  Will it get cheaper, lighter, more efficient?  Will it work well with improvements in energy storage?  Added to EV's as an example, will solar materially change the marketplace?

If you missed it today, below is the story we ran a few weeks ago on our main network site--Renewable Now Network. com--and we will soon add excerpts from her show on the same channel under sustainable science:  



A new material has been shown to have the capability to double the efficiency of solar cells by researchers at Purdue University and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Conventional solar cells are at most one-third efficient, a limit known to scientists as the Shockley-Queisser Limit. The new material, a crystalline structure that contains both inorganic materials (iodine and lead) and an organic material (methyl-ammonium), boosts the efficiency so that it can carry two-thirds of the energy from light without losing as much energy to heat. In less technical terms, this material could double the amount of electricity produced without a significant cost increase. Enough solar energy reaches the earth to supply all of the planet’s energy needs multiple times over, but capturing that energy has been difficult – as of 2013, only about 1 percent of the world’s grid electricity was produced from solar panels. 



Libai Huang, assistant professor of chemistry at Purdue, says the new material, called a hybrid perovskites, would create solar cells thinner than conventional silicon solar cells, and is also flexible, cheap and easy to make. “My graduate students learn how to make it in a few days,” she says. The breakthrough is published this week in the journal Science. The most common solar cells use silicon as a semiconductor, which can transmit only one-third of the energy because of the band gap, which is the amount of energy needed to boost an electron from a bound state to a conducting state, in which the electrons are able to move, creating electricity.....

 See more at: http://www.renewablenownetwork.com/crystalline-material-could-replace-silicon-to-double-efficiency-of-solar-cells/#sthash.HNdDjDNh.dpuf

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

The Race to Bring Groceries Online in the US

We continue to look at consumer trends which will impact our world in big ways.  Shifting food shopping to the web is a dramatic change in human behavior.

Calculating the net impact on the environment will be a complicated formula.  Hard to predict if total transpiration miles of getting food to the table will decline, if consumption changes, if net utility costs comes down.  Theoretically, it looks like a big win for improving the green score of buying groceries.  But, questions remain if it is good for farmers, packagers, distributors or leads to better quality and nutrition of food.



Online grocery, especially the purchase of food and beverage products, faces an uphill battle in the US. Consumers tend to prefer the store experience, especially to inspect the fresh products. They also hesitate to pay for delivery and do not like waiting at home for the delivery. Another issue is “out of stocks” that make for a less than compelling customer experience. As a result, grocery products have been the last categories to move online but the race is on to crack this market.

Many different types of players in the race

Different companies are working to persuade Americans to buy groceries online. Pure online grocers, such as Peapod and FreshDirect, have built specific warehouses to improve selection and delivery of grocery products. They have been joined by third party logistics players, such as Instacart and Postmates. These players use stores as warehouses to deliver products in less than two hours of the order being placed. There are also traditional brick and mortar grocers, such as Walmart and Kroger, which offer click and collect services for grocery products.

Amazon makes various bets in online grocery

Amazon is making bold moves to conquer the grocery category. Its first move was in 2007 when it launched AmazonFresh. This is an additional service that costs Prime members US$14.99 a month for the delivery of grocery items, including perishables. The program had been slow to roll out to many cities, but picked up pace in 2016 and 2017.
In 2014, it launched Prime Pantry, which allows Prime members to purchase groceries for a flat shipping rate for all items that fit within a particular box and are under a certain weight. At the end of that same year, it also launched PrimeNow. PrimeNow is a service that gives Prime members free two hour delivery and one hour delivery for a fee of US$7.99. While Prime Now isn’t a dedicated grocery delivery service, its most popular products that are delivered are groceries.
But the biggest news is that Amazon is experimenting with stores for grocery products. The Amazon Go convenience store allows people to shop and simply walk out of the store. The technology will automatically bill the Amazon account. Another concept is the AmazonFresh Pickup stores. Prime members will be able to order online, reserve a pick up time and drive up to the store. An Amazon employee will load their car with the order. Both concepts are currently in trial mode, being tested by Amazon employees.

Americans are becoming more comfortable buying groceries online

These industry initiatives, coupled with Americans becoming more comfortable with online purchasing in general, are resulting in higher food and drink sales through internet retailing, which grew by 57% over the past five years. Euromonitor International expects another 60% growth in the next five years.
There’s also been a dramatic shift in consumer behavior in the past three years. According to Euromonitor International’s Global Consumer Trends Survey, 25% of Americans shopped for groceries online at least once in 2013. The percentage increased to 38% in 2016.
The frequency of online grocery shopping increased in that time frame. Interestingly, the percentage of Americans between the ages of 20 and 29 who shopped online for groceries daily or weekly doubled in the past three years. With younger generations shopping more frequently online for groceries, it is likely that this channel will grow.
To learn more about online grocery trends, please join us for a networking event on Wednesday June 7th. We will have a panel discussion featuring representatives from Instacart, Peapod, and MillerCoors. Register here.

Warren Buffett says AI will lead to fewer jobs, warning future could be 'enormously disruptive'

Is the future now?  Are machines replacing people in work and leading the future?   Is this, as is our migration away from fossil fuel, the next great industrial revolution?  What does it mean to building a cleaner, brighter future and a sustainable world?

Lots, we believe.  AI will be in all sorts of machines.  Robotics will be prolific.  Cars will self drive, as we know  Machines will teach.  Automation will homogenize our world.

Warren Buffet is a good guy to ask if AI will reshape our economy.  We believe our financial future is tied to balancing the economy and environment.  Will AI speed and improve that process?  Or, will machines be insensitive to human health conditions and be happy to profligately produce goods at crushing rates?

 

OMAHA — Nearly two decades ago, a 10-year-old shareholder stood in front of a microphone here and asked Warren Buffett how the Internet would reshape companies.
It was 2000. Buffett, the chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, said fairly little. He saw a threat in the Internet, but said he was unsure how it would ultimately affect his investments, according to a report at the time.
On Saturday, that same shareholder, Thomas Kamei, now a 27-year-old investor based in New York, submitted an updated version of his question at Berkshire's annual meeting. This time, Kamei focused on artificial intelligence, a technology that threatens to upend the economy just as the Internet did years before. What did Buffett make of it?
Buffett said that AI could be "enormously disruptive," yet beneficial in making the economy more efficient.
"I would certainly think [AI] would result in significantly less employment in certain areas," he said. "It would be a good thing that would require enormous transformation in how people relate to each other, what they expect of government, all kinds of things."
The comments came during a more than six-hour Q&A session in which Buffett and his investing partner, Charlie Munger, repeatedly praised efforts to make businesses more productive, despite job losses. They pointed to past advancements in farming and auto manufacturing, industries able to do more with fewer workers.
The duo also defended their work with 3G Capital, the controversial Brazilian private equity firm known for aggressive cost cutting and layoffs. Kraft Heinz, backed by Berkshire and 3G, laid off 1,000 workers in 2016 and plans to cut thousands of additional positions, a strategy seen at odds with Berkshire's folksy image.
The fear, though, is that AI may cause even more losses. A recent study by PwC found that about 40 percent of jobs could be automated with current technology by 2030.
Buffett laid out a theoretical scenario at one of Berkshire's best-known companies, Geico. The insurer employs about 36,000 people, yet the financial services industry is seen as vulnerable to automation. Buffett asked: What if all of Geico's current functions, aided by AI, could be done by 10,000 people, or a third of the staff?
"I don't think we've ever experienced anything quite like that," he said.
Munger, known for his brevity, told Buffett not to worry. "It's not going to come that quickly," he responded.
When a shareholder later asked Buffett if he would push back on a Berkshire subsidiary that wanted to move a factory overseas, Buffett gave examples of previous Berkshire companies like Dexter Shoes that had already been forced to do so.
Global trade, he said, benefited the U.S. by providing consumers with lower prices and more places to sell goods. But he also said that it could create "roadkill" of people, one reason he wants more government programs for displaced workers. He did not outline specific proposals, but said the U.S. needed an "educator-in-chief" who could explain the benefits of trade and come up with solutions.
Unemployment insurance already existed and provided help to those in need, Munger said.
"I'm afraid a capitalist system is going to hurt some people as it modifies and improves," Munger said. "There's no way to avoid it."

Monday, May 8, 2017

‘Look, Ma, No Fuel!’

Solar continues to replace fossil fuel in small and large ways.

‘Look, Ma, No Fuel!’ … Fire-free Cooking with Solar

solar
… And no smoke, and no pollution either; no match boxes, no fire-wood collecting, no charcoal burning, and no ash. No waiting for the deliveryman to take away the old LPG cylinder and bring in the new. A cooking revolution looms.



The cooking supply chain is being disrupted. Bounty from the sky, delivered free to the roof, drives the new cooking economy, and not the laboriously drilled, mined, transported, stored, and distributed fuel from the ground, say, kerosene or natural gas, let alone charcoal, firewood or biomass of any kind.



This is a reason to celebrate — for it creates choices for homemakers, frees up women’s time to undertake creative and productive work, and reduces health problems that today affect women and children disproportionately when they cook with smoky systems at home.



Precursors to the impending cooking revolution have been with us for a while — microwave ovens, induction cookers, resistive hotplates, electric water kettles. But they are not strictly fire-free, fuel free, or emissions free in that behind the elegant and useful appliances, in the hinterlands far from cities they are based on electricity produced from burning coal, overwhelmingly, and natural gas lately in the US. Hydro-power or nuclear plants contribute a small portion of today’s electricity, and not without hazards and environmentally high costs. 

Can Digitalization Really Lead to Better Performance for Utilities?

Get the most from your assets and budget – Using improved levels of insight helps organizations take immediate action to prioritize resources and maintenance response times. Read More...
The revolution I am talking about is local electricity — rooftop solar based, complemented by batteries and related electronics — fed into the house; no electricity grid with giant generation plants and massive transmission and distribution networks necessary.



Wireless “LPG” or “Pipeless” Natural Gas or “Cylinder free Gas”
When I was a student, I remember how on wintry mornings in New Delhi, just outside the campus gate of our engineering institute, sitting in a huddle around a fire, we ordered and sipped tea straight off the boiling pan, holding a small glass with two fingers in a pincer grip. 


Accompanying the chatter of those around us was the background noise of a hissing kerosene stove. That sound was integral to the scene. Water was always boiling over the flame, tea made in batches, filtered through a cloth sieve, and poured into the glasses, nominally rinsed, I now shudder to think. I am sure paper cups now replace the glasses.

Walking along the streets of Pune, on certain corners one sees vendors of dosas, often outside the gates of colleges. Half the joy is in watching the master street chef prepare them in front of your eyes. Here too, alongside the bustle of the street, and the circle of observers waiting their turn with the food, is the hissing stove under the large flat iron pan, always kerosene-fired. The sound of the stove is again a part of the overall experience.

Consider backyard cooking in U.S. homes.


 The setup is elaborate, with coal or propane fires and grilles. The ritual of assembling the food to be grilled, and the lighting of the cooking range builds a festive, holiday atmosphere. But can it be simpler, without loss of atmosphere, with solar panels and batteries? I think so.


Indeed, on March 29, in Solana Beach, Calif., Dr. Barry Butler, Cindy Davenport, Roger Davenport, and I cooked toor lentils and stir-fried green and red peppers, onions, ginger and spices on a hotplate fired by solar panels, and ate it over rice in Dr. Butler's backyard.

Cooking Without Burn-ers



Fast-forward a year or two out, and the tea and the dosas will be the same, but cooked without fire, without kerosene, without the hissing noise. How? Solar-powered, battery enabled, over resistive hotplate or induction cookers. A portable solar canopy, a large umbrella over the fire-less stove collecting solar radiation and feeding it to the cookstove, mediated by a Li-ion battery.




Personal, portable, ad hoc cooking in the open for the common man — no “burn”er necessary.
In the U.S., Sears, Home Depot, IKEA, Target, Walmart, and perhaps Best Buy, may include solar cooking systems in their stores and catalogs.

Solar Systems Design with Cooking at the Center


Solar Home Systems (SHS) have historically focused on lighting, phone charging, sometimes fans and TVs. And the focus on lighting for un-electrified villages in Africa, India, Bangladesh, Haiti, and elsewhere is as it should be — light after sundown must be among the most critical uses of electricity.


To me, lighting is now a done deal, a solved problem. With solar panels and batteries plus extraordinarily efficient LED bulbs, light is, if I may so describe it, easy. Solar systems may now be designed for the most energy intensive, yet critical, application for a home — cooking. If we do so, applications like lighting and charging for phones, laptops, TVs and home electronics will come with cooking at incremental cost, as a byproduct. 



At What Cost?
The prices of this next generation cooking system will represent amortized capital costs, and not the costs for fuel and the logistics infrastructure as today. The capital first costs are high for rural villagers in emerging economies, but if those costs are translated into monthly payments, paid using phones, as the villagers do today, they are reasonable and affordable, and over time cheaper than for LPG.



For instance, the monthly costs of a solar cooking solution costing, say, $1,200, with an up to 20-year life for solar panels, less for batteries, and with ~ 9 percent cost of money, would be close to Rs. 740/month, the same as that for a LPG cylinder without subsidy in India. This is about $11/month, or $0.37/day, or Rs. 25/day for a family of four. The poorest rural households worldwide pay more than this for kerosene burning today. The only “solution” cheaper would be the “free” cooking by collecting firewood and burning it in a cookstove, however crude or well-designed.



This solar-based cooking solution is not merely for rural households without electricity, or street vendors, or backyard cooking in the U.S. Even in apartment homes in urban areas, the solution can be deployed to deliver an even lower cost solution with suitable optimization.



A broader question arises: What is the hub of a microgrid design of the future? Substation? Supermarket? Municipality? Neighborhood? Home Owners Association? At least one hub might be a solution with cooking as the core application in a cluster of apartment buildings.

Saturday, May 6, 2017

Sir Ian Cheshire: Sustainability leadership will be defined by courage/Edie.net

Amen to this.  Let's do it and become true leaders:

Companies that embrace new business models that push beyond 'defensive' actions to future-proof operations will be the next generation of sustainability leaders, British businessman Sir Ian Cheshire has said.

The former B&Q boss called on companies to introduce new business models fit a the low-carbon, resource-efficient economy

Speaking at a Business in the Community (BITC) event as part of Responsible Business Week, the executive member of Debenhams and new Barclays chairman called on firms to show more courage and make ambitious commitments that they don’t yet have answers for in order to be at the forefront of the low-carbon transition.

“You have to assume that [the low-carbon transition] is an opportunity,” Cheshire said. “It’s going to happen to you anyway, so you should frame it as an opportunity. If you don’t figure out how to be one of the winners, I can predict, quite confidently, that you’ll be one of the losers.

“This can’t just be about future-proofing businesses because that is slightly defensive, the point is to be a future winner, and the opportunities for those who figure this out are huge. But it takes the courage to look into what your business might be, compared to what it is now. Ultimately, this is about leadership.”

Cheshire, who stepped down as chief executive of home improvement retailer Kingfisher in 2014, said that companies are currently faced with "the Kodak challenge", alluding to the failure of the American camera company to “destroy” its existing business model when the market was showing signs of transformational change.

The new Barclays chair called on companies to "cannibalise" themselves to introduce new business models fit for a low-carbon, resource-efficient economy. Both the circular and sharing economies have presented themselves as viable options in recent years, and Cheshire - who also holds the role of senior independent director at hospitality company Whitbread - believes that these more sustainable business models pose a significant opportunity.

As an example, one of Whitbread’s brands, Costa Coffee, has embraced elements of the circular economy  to overcome challenges relating to the recyclability of paper coffee cups. Currently, less than 1% of takeaway cups are recycled in the UK, and Costa is keen to drive change; implementing take-back schemes and exploring new recyclable materials to be used in the cups. By adopting this business strategy, Cheshire said Costa had become a leader in its industry, underlined by the expected growth of the company and its ever-increasing commitments to sustainability.

Financial rewards

Joining Cheshire at the BITC event were the heads of sustainability at supermarket group Sainsbury’s and telecoms company BT - two firms that have seen significant financial rewards after placing a bigger focus on sustainability initiatives.

Sainsbury’s head of sustainability Paul Crewe told delegates that the highest return on investments that his company makes now come from sustainability projects. And the results are striking: since 2005, Sainsbury’s has expanded supermarket space by 52%, whilst cutting its energy bill by 20%.

“Sustainability is about the commercial criticality of business itself,” Crewe said. “For us to be sustainable and to be here in 20 years, we need to look at our own operations and make sure that the things that we do still make commercial sense.”

Also appearing on stage, BT’s Gabrielle Giner revealed that her company’s Net Good carbon reduction programme was worth as much as £3.6bn last year - a 16% growth over two years - and is now the fastest growing area of revenue for the firm. BT's proactive approach to sustainability has been engrained in the company since it set its first emissions target in 1992 and, in 2008, the firm adopted a science-based target for emissions - a move which Giner believes strengthened the offering of the sustainability team in the eyes of the boardroom.

“The science hasn’t just helped us set the targets, it has also helped us explain to people why it was picked,” Giner said. “We’re now working with Carbon Trust to look at what a 1.5C target would mean for BT, following the results of the Paris Agreement.”

Science-based approach

Indeed, last week's event coincided with the launch of BITC’s new ‘smart growth, report, which found that the adoption of science-based-targets has become one of the biggest challenges, and opportunities, facing sustainability professionals.

Another panellist at the event, Carbon Trust’s chief executive Tom Delay, added that boards are still struggling to align two different realities of business strategies and long-term megatrends, such as climate change. One solution to this struggle, Delay said, is the use of science-based targets. The Carbon Trust has been working with a number of companies - including BT and Sainsbury's - to develop appropriate science-based targets for sustainability.

So far, 262 companies have fully committed to science-based initiatives, including 10 Fortune 500 companies such as Procter & Gamble, General Mills and Kellogg’s. Moreover, 72 Fortune 500 firms intend to set such targets by 2019. However, Delay stated that, while discussions regarding science-based targets are clearly growing, the concept still isn’t resonating in a key market: the financial sector.

“Boards struggle to create a narrative that links the business plan on the horizon with the reality of future challenges," Delay said. "They recognise that this challenge is difficult and, in some cases, they hide it from the investor community who’s long-term buy-in they are seeking to get.

“Science-based targets will demonstrate to investors and employees that what we are doing is meaningful and consistent with long-term targets. It is, in essence, the 'anti-greenwash'. But, something that became very obvious to us very quickly is that discussions around science-based targets are great but the concept doesn’t resonate with the financial community very broadly.”

Matt Mace

Friday, May 5, 2017

The Tesla of trucks can drive, tow, and even power tools, all on electricity

Any headline that has Tesla in it gets lots of attention.  This one got ours as we read about Workhorse and their new, hybrid truck.

Hybrid and EV technology is extending across many mobile platforms.  The power generated is now sufficient to move bigger vehicles.  Battery systems are improving daily.  And solar units are typically being added to integrate consistent recharging of the energy storage units.

As consumers we love choices.  Now truck lovers will have choices.  And can feel better about their environmental impact.

The Tesla of trucks can drive, tow, and even power tools, all on electricity

by Ronan Glon

RIC, Moses Brown named Green Ribbon Schools

Congratulations to one of our partners, Rhode Island College, for getting named a Green Ribbon School.  We applaud their sustainability director, Jim Murphy, and the entire team for a great achievement.




PROVIDENCE – Rhode Island College and Moses Brown School have been named 2017 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools. They are the only two schools in Rhode Island to receive the Green Ribbon designation for their environmental, health and wellness efforts. A total of 63 honorees were recognized nationwide and honored for their “innovative…RHODE ISLAND College and Moses Brown School have been named 2017 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools.